On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 11:33, Lewi wrote: > > well, when I'm trying to search information in internet, I found that > linux with samba is slower than NT > try a look at: > http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/openbench1.html > I know that the result maybe can't be compared today > does anyone know anything about this, and what do u think?
While others quickly point out that this study was largely bunk (and debunked), it should also be said that the study and profiling that followed *did* point out some bottlenecks with regard to the Linux/samba setup. These were addressed by Linux and samba developers, and as a result both Linux and samba preform somewhat better now than they did then. It's said that there are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics. Wait, four kinds: lies, damned lies, statistics, and benchmarks. No, five: delivery dates.... Yes, definitely delivery dates. _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list