On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 11:33, Lewi wrote:
> 
> well, when I'm trying to search information in internet, I found that 
> linux with samba is slower than NT
> try a look at:
> http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/openbench1.html
> I know that the result maybe can't be compared today
> does anyone know anything about this, and what do u think?

While others quickly point out that this study was largely bunk (and
debunked), it should also be said that the study and profiling that
followed *did* point out some bottlenecks with regard to the Linux/samba
setup.  These were addressed by Linux and samba developers, and as a
result both Linux and samba preform somewhat better now than they did
then.

It's said that there are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and
statistics.  Wait, four kinds: lies, damned lies, statistics, and
benchmarks.  No, five: delivery dates.... Yes, definitely delivery
dates.



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to