> > >* and then David Talkington declared.... > >>> Frank Carreiro wrote: >>> >> >>>> >ncftp IS ftp. Comparing it to scp doesn't make sense. >>>> > >>>> >Why not use sftp instead? You are not required to input the path and >>>> >it's very much like what you are doing now. >>> >>> >>> Except that, as far as I can tell, sftp doesn't do directories or >>> wildcards; only individual files ... nothing in the man page, at >>> least. >> Does ncftp do directories? I was unaware of any ftp product with this ability. If you could I would simply tar/gzip it then sftp the file(s) across.
>> > >er.. I couldn't even get it to connect to the server! >Could be a ssh1/2 thing? > Possible. I've pretty much disabled ssh1 across the board. Openssh has been working great around here for the last year we've been running it (replaced an older ssh1 product). Frank _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
