IMHO, in terms of real-world computing, it's far more important to be stable, reliable, and well-tasked than to be on the edge for the edge's sake. but at the same time I can understand the slobbering for the next big number. here's hoping that the "Slashdot First Post" attitude never seeps into enterprise level system administrators.
nice plug for the good folks in NC, there. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Actually (for me) it is never something new it is always having > something newer... always having the latest and newest product that can > keep a person on edge for the next new release.. now with 7.2 it turned > out to be a great os, but knowing rdht they will come up with something > better.. and this makes waiting no fun.. make since?? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On Behalf Of Matthew Boeckman > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 5:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Any ETA on Redhat 8? *tracker* > > why does this matter? 7.2 is just out, is (for me) super with the > inclusion of ext3... what super crazy bleeding edge features are you > guys looking for that necessitate the obsession with a beta or release > date for the next version? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>How bout the beta release... any idea of name, location or release.. >>hopefully it will not be another rosewell and will not exist two weeks >>after everyone has been getting it... >> >> >> >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Redhat-list mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >> >> >> >> > > -- Matthew Boeckman (816) 777-2160 Manager - Systems Integration Saepio Technologies == == The secret to how our government controls information is easily expl*** **MESSAGE TRUNCATED** _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
