At 1/30/2002 01:17 AM -0500, you wrote: >On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > >If it's a small database, I'd go for the fingerprint; if it's fairly > >large, then studying the overhead versus the bulk is important. Don't > >know enough about tuning to help you, though; just know that whoever > >*can* help you is going to need more info. > >I would recommend just the opposite. If the database is small, the >calculation would be a waste of time. Just index the whole key. If the >database is large, the time lost in calculation woudl be made in in search >speed.
Please allow me to hide under the rug in embarrassment. I have punished my fingers for typing such idiocy; Tony is, of course, right. Somehow I got my head screwed on backwards for a moment. -- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
