On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, David Kramer wrote:

> Thanks for giving such a detailed answer.  One more question though:
> 
> On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Mike Burger wrote:
> 
> > The format of this file is the same as ifcfg-eth0, but doesn't need 
> > everything that is in the ifcfg-eth0 file.  You'll really only need the 
> > following lines:
> > 
> > DEVICE=eth0:0 (or eth0:1, etc)
> > IPADDR=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (put in the new IP address, here)
> > NETMASK=yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy (if your new IP address is in the same range as 
> >     the old one, this should be the same as the netmask in ifcfg-eth0.  
> >     Otherwise, you should put in whichever netmask you were assigned.)
> 
> So is this in addition to, or instead of the ifcfg-eth0 file?  DO I put 
> the "default" IPADDR and NETMASK in ifcfg-eth0, or leave it out?

The ifcfg-eth0:x files are in addition to the ifcfg-eth0.  ifcfg-eth0 sets 
up the initial eth0 interface...which represents the physical interface.  
ifcfg-eth0:x sets up virtual interfaces eth0:x.

> > > 2) If I want to have different email addresses on the second domain name, 
> > > how can I do that?
> > 
> > The specifics vary, depending on which MTA you're using, but in most 
> > cases, it revolves around using the virtual user table.  Check your MTA's 
> > documentation regarding implementation of virtual users and domains.
> 
> I was afraid of that.  I'm using sendmail, and virtusertable looks VERY 
> complicated.  Maybe I'm reading too much into it.

You're reading too much into it. <G>



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to