mine had this O DaemonPortOptions=Port=587, Name=MSA, M=E does anyone know if 587 needs to be listening ?
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Martín Marqués wrote: > On Mar 04 Dic 2001 18:28, you wrote: > > Hi Martín, > > > > On Tuesday, December 04, 2001, 4:22:24 PM, you babbled something about: > > > > MM> I have a question for the people of RH. Why is the default > > configuration of MM> sendmail in RH 7.2 (and I was told in 7.1 too) is to > > only listen to the MM> loopback device, and not to the ethernets? > > > > I think it is a great idea. Much fewer open relays from default installs. > > Now if only Exchange and Domino would do this, there would be a lot less > > spam. > > In that case, why not keep blocking with the NO-RELEY, and add the relay > hosts to /etc/mail/relay-domains? > > > MM> Is there a solution for making a MTA server,that doesn't mean compiling > > with MM> m4 the sendmail.mc after the apropiate configuration? > > > > Yes, but it is not the "recommended way" of doing it. > > > > Simply comment out the line that looks like this... > > # O DaemonPortOptions=Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA > > > > in your /etc/sendmail.cf > > I'm not the person who had the problem, but I am at this moment downloading > sendmail-8.11.6 and would like to know 2 things: > > 1) Those this sendmail have the default configuration described before? > > 2) One of the machines I'll update is and old RH which happens to have only > one package of sendmail, and now there are 3 (the package, the -cf and the > doc). Which are mandatory? > > Saludos... :-) > > _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
