On Fri  9. November 2001 15:05, you (tc lewis) wrote:
> yeah, i use a bunch of djb's stuff.  with daemontools, check out the
> "package/install" file that you're supposed to run to install it.  it just
> executes other commands.  well, if you just run the package/compile
> script and not the other 2, it'll dump the binaries in a "command"
> directory.  you can copy them wherever you want from there.

Okay, I traced it to this point. I was only wondering if I REALLY can move 
the binaries somewhere, where they may be reached by standard PATH variable 
mean. I was affraid that the dns binaries (for example) may have hardcoded 
locations of the daemontools binaries (for security, for example).
If you say I can copy them, I believe you.  :-)

> the djbdns package you can put wherever you want by modifying the
> "conf-home" file before compiling it, although that will probably change
> in the future sometime whenever there's another release.
>
> note that i'm not recommending you do anything.  i support the /package
> and /command ideas.  but you're welcome to do as you wish.

I am not sure which approach is better. Use your own directory structure or 
try to conform FHS...
I administer another system (SunOS) where, over years, I created non-standard 
directory structure... Now I regret. But, on the other side it's a little 
easier to backup related data and binaries with this structure... But on the 
other side... :)
Anyway, I believe it's good to keep the / directory as clean as possible.
(I also hate Windows programs/divers/anything that go to c:\ instead of 
c:\program files)

--Mariusz


-- 

Tego nie znajdziesz w żadnym sklepie!
[ http://oferty.onet.pl ]



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to