The problem is that, in my experience, it is the correct answer.
Linuxconf has a bad habit of overwriting configuration files which aren't
even part of the changes a user was making.
Webmin only makes the changes you request it to make, and has been a more
stable and secure product.
It's free, simple to use, and the only recommendation I can make for the
situation at hand. I can not, from my experience, or the experiences of
others which can be gleaned on this list (search the archives), or in good
conscience, recommend any version of linuxconf as "stable" or even
"properly usable".
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Peter Peltonen wrote:
>
> You can't answer "none" to the question "what is the *most* stable release"...
>
> I'm asking this as a person I know uses Linuxconf. He knows nothing about
> Linux. He doesn't want to use anything else. He is running the linuxconf that
> comes with RH6.2. I know there must be a bit more stable and fucntioning beast
> out there...
>
> A simple question to which I want a simple answer :)
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> Mike Burger wrote:
> >
> > None. Download Webmin from www.webmin.com...you'll be much happier for
> > done so.
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Peter Peltonen wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > What is the most stable release of linuxconf that I should consider running on
> > > RH6.2?
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Peter
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Redhat-list mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
