Hi Trond,
> > Also I seem to have the option to assign this bug to someone. Should
> > I do this, or leave it as new?
>
> Don't do that (now, if someone were just bright enough to realize that
> "severity: high" in 99% of the cases isn't the correct level for the
> bug they just submitted...)
Well, I had some doubts about the severity level. This bugreport is about the
fact that init logs every message with level LOG_INFO. So not a bug in the
strict sense, but I chose severity level "low" instead of "enhancement"
because I feel this behaviour needs improvement and "enhancement" might not be
looked at in the near future. Maybe I should even have chosen "normal".
Another thing, do you think the report is less closely examined since I
posted using Win-98 ;)?
FYI, this is bugreport #29406. Although the patch I wrote seems to function
on my system (only added a true loglevel parameter to the code for the log
function) I have some questions as for the appropriate log level to use. Fe,
the kernel uses LOG_WARN for "normal" messages. I feel this to be the
appropriate log level for most init messages as well ("entering runlevel").
Also I am not sure if a segmentation fault should be logged with level LOG_ERR
or higher.
Thanx for your interest,
Bye,
Leonard.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list