On Wednesday 07 March 2001 08:35, you wrote:
> GPG signatures are used to ensure the authenticity of the package, that it
> came from who it was supposed to.
>
> I'd be a little wary of the packages, unless someone from RedHat can
> confirm their authenticity for you.
>
Oh? That seems to make sense. But these files are from the RedHat Update
site? Now what?
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Ted Gervais wrote:
>
> >
> > Question -
> >
> > I was trying to use up2date this morning and found that on all the
packages
> > it said:
> >
> > 'this package .....not signed with a GPG signature. Continue?
> >
> > What does that mean? Is that a problem??
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>
--
Ted Gervais
Coldbrook, Nova Scotia Canada.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
