again, not trying to be antagonistic, just convey that i'm looking for
certain information.
obviously no one is obligated to answer my questions here.
-tcl.
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, RaghuNath L wrote:
> Hello Lewis,
>
>
> No body whether it's Tom or Dick are not oblized to give you a solution when ever
> you wan't
>
> please be soft in your addressing to other person , this not stage for testing any
> bodies skill's .
>
>
> tc lewis wrote:
>
> > you're still not adressing my question, so i'm assuming you don't know,
> > and that's fine. i'm not really looking for recommendations. i'm looking
> > for an answer as to whether that's the patch to prevent this vulnerability
> > or not. i'm not concerned with the worm's date/banner checking thing, i'm
> > concerned about the vulnerability itself. i'm fully aware of general
> > upgrade vs non-upgrade issues and redhat's issues overall. heh.
> >
> > not trying to be antagonistic, just trying to get the info about that
> > patch vs the vulnerability.
> >
>
> --
> Regards ph:5099025
> RaghuNath L pager:9624395369
> WSS-Team,Texas Instruments.
> You have to live on the edge of reality -
> to make your dreams come true!!!
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
