Thornton Prime wrote: am running that version. Am I vulnerable for the attack? > > If you are running 6.2, and have upgraded with this advisory, > > http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2000-039-02.html > > then you are fine. Good. Because people are talking about vulnerable 2.6.0 it got me a bit confused as the wu-ftpd-2.6.0-14.6x.i386.rpm from the RH support site _is_ of version 2.6.0. Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Re: Ramen worm Jeff Lane
- Re: Ramen worm chuck
- Re: Ramen worm Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: Ramen worm Justin Zygmont
- Re: Ramen worm Jeff Lane
- Re: Ramen worm Mike Burger
- Re: Ramen worm Michael H. Warfield
- Re: Ramen worm Jeff Lane
- Re: Ramen worm Peter Peltonen
- Re: Ramen worm Thornton Prime
- Re: Ramen worm Peter Peltonen
- Re: Ramen worm Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: Ramen worm Michael H. Warfield
- Re: Ramen worm Jeff Lane
- Re: Ramen worm Michael H. Warfield
- Re: Ramen worm Tomás García Ferrari
- Re: Ramen worm Thomas Ribbrock
- Re: Ramen worm Hal Burgiss
- Re: Ramen worm Thomas Ribbrock
- Re: Ramen worm Hal Burgiss
- Re: Ramen worm Michael H. Warfield