Well, not intentionally!

It's fixed now.  Apparently they didn't have it set up properly at the
ISP, plus I had to reconfigure the Cisco router, plus I had to redo the
routing of the LAN...

Glen



Monday, at 19:24, Bret Hughes sent through the Star Gate:

>Glen Lee Edwards wrote:
>
>> I need to ask a question along these lines:  I just leased an 8ip subnet
>> from my ISP.  I assumed that all 5 usable IP addresses would be accessible
>> from anywhere on the www.  However, I've found out that it isn't working
>> that way. The only address that is externally accessible is the gw
>> address, which is assigned to my Cisco router.  When I ping to the other
>> addresses I get the following:
>>
>> $ ping 209.98.11.42
>> PING 209.98.11.42 (209.98.11.42) from 192.168.5.12 : 56(84) bytes of data.
>> >From dsl.citilink.com (209.98.10.254): Time to live exceeded
>> >From dsl.citilink.com (209.98.10.254): Time to live exceeded
>> >From dsl.citilink.com (209.98.10.254): Time to live exceeded
>>
>>  --- 209.98.11.42 ping statistics ---
>> 4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, +3 errors, 100% packet loss
>>
>> The "ping" is being intercepted by one of my ISP's computer. It isn't
>> supposed to do this, is it?
>
>For what is it worth:
>
># traceroute 209.98.11.42
>traceroute to 209.98.11.42 (209.98.11.42), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
> 1  tulfw1 (192.168.0.1)  1.195 ms  0.796 ms  0.716 ms
> 2  adsl-xxx-xxx-xxx-xxx.dsl.tulsok.swbell.net (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)  28.351 ms
>15.693 ms  16.486 ms
> 3  core1-fa1-1-0.tulsok.swbell.net (151.164.67.66)  14.321 ms  14.926 ms
>13.167 ms
> 4  edge1-fa6-1-0.tulsok.swbell.net (151.164.67.241)  13.216 ms  12.167 ms
>13.166 ms
> 5  tulsok1wct1.sbc-tulsa.50meg.ipcc.wcg.net (151.142.220.221)  15.177 ms
>15.067 ms  16.457 ms
> 6  151.142.221.81 (151.142.221.81)  16.515 ms  16.494 ms  15.461 ms
> 7  chcgil1wcx2-oc12.ipcc.wcg.net (64.200.240.58)  40.116 ms  43.191 ms
>42.563 ms
> 8  chcgil1wcx3-oc48.ipcc.cg.net (64.200.233.62)  42.414 ms  41.664 ms
>43.042 ms
> 9  34.ATM3-0.GW1.CHI2.ALTER.NET (157.130.117.109)  44.771 ms  48.839 ms
>43.257 ms
>10  161.at-5-0-0.XR1.CHI2.ALTER.NET (152.63.64.130)  43.016 ms  45.753 ms
>42.306 ms
>11  0.so-7-0-0.XR1.CHI2.ALTER.NET (152.63.67.130)  49.213 ms  43.926 ms
>44.798 ms
>12  193.ATM7-0.XR1.CHI4.ALTER.NET (152.63.64.250)  45.553 ms  44.421 ms
>46.051 ms
>13  195.ATM10-0-0.GW3.MSP1.ALTER.NET (146.188.209.193)  55.801 ms  55.112 ms
>52.177 ms
>14  visi-gw.customer.ALTER.NET (157.130.98.2)  480.690 ms  613.678 ms
>853.625 ms
>15  fa0-0.c7200-1.border.mpls.visi.com (209.98.3.211)  1307.076 ms  702.864
>ms  559.991 ms
>16  citilink-gw.customer.visi.com (209.98.2.126)  60.453 ms  54.938 ms
>56.160 ms
>17  dsl.citilink.com (209.98.10.254)  61.047 ms  68.665 ms  66.134 ms
>18  * * *
>19  dsl.citilink.com (209.98.10.254)  90.510 ms  83.951 ms  87.929 ms
>20  * * *
>21  dsl.citilink.com (209.98.10.254)  127.149 ms  109.387 ms  107.835 ms
>
>
>I also got the same behavior going to 209.98.11.41.  I assume you rejected me
>:(
>
>Bret
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Redhat-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to