On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:04:22PM -0600, Michael R. Jinks wrote:
> I should say here that I'm one of the "everything's fine" people
> from past rounds of this thread. I've had good luck with RH7 for
> most purposes. Kernel compilation works fine. Other binaries work
> fine. What I'd like to know is, does anybody have any actual
> experience in which Red Hat 7's gcc actually caused problems --
> rather than just hollering back and forth about what the gcc people,
> Linus, or anybody else has said about it being "broken"?
Well, I am pretty much with you. No problems with compilers and have
built a number of things. Maybe I am lucky. While I think I've read
that article, I hope links are included to Alan Cox's response to
Linus. And yes, I know Alan draws a RH paycheck, but I don't think he
is in anybody's pocket. I think the biggest mistake RH made is
assuming their users could handle two different compilers being
installed, and be able to revert when and if the need arose <duck>.
--
Hal B
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
