On Thu, 02 Nov 2000, Bret Hughes wrote:
>
> Well after going through all that and rereading your post John it is apparent
> that there are some changes to hwclock between the RH6.0 and the RH6.2 machines
> I have. For instance, the hwclock manpage I quoted was from the RH6.0 and
> I noticed that there is not even a --localtime option in it. I apologize for
> any confusion I may have caused and will go read the new one now.
>
No sweat... :-)
[clip]
>
> It looks like the newer version is going to make more sense to use and mybye I
> won't get quite the headache that I did trying to understand what was happening
> the first time I waded in to this stuff.
>
> Again my apologies for RWOR (responding without research) or even apparently
> reading your message very well.
>
> With the list so slow I decided not to wait for my orig. response to reply to
>
Looks like we were BOTH right -- for the versions of
hwclock that we were each referring to. :-)
Anyway, no offense taken. After all if you can't have a
spirited discussion in this list, why bother to read it? ;-)
John
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
