Howdy,
Ok, this may sound silly but:
This is a leased co-hosted box. It was already set up with Red Hat when we leased it.
I have no idea where to look for ipchain rules (I didn't add them, but the people we
leased it from might have).
Where would they generally be found?
By the way, syslogd has been running full tilt now for nearly a week since I first
noticed it. And there's really not very much traffic on this server. Also, there's
really not too much stuff in the log files.
Are there any binaries I could check with md5sum? Which ones would they be? If so, I"d
appreciate it if someone who has a working syslogd could post their md5sum value.
Thanks,
JW
At 04:54 AM 10/7/2000 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi Jonathan,
>
>The only thing I can think of that may even REMOTELY get your klogd going
>that strong is if you have a lot of kernel errors (check your logs) or you
>are logging nearly everything that ipchains is doing. If you are doing the
>later (logging a lot of packets) you will get a lot out of klogd.
>
>Have fun,
>--
>_________________________________________________________________
> Brian Ashe CTO
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dee-Web Software Services, LLC.
> http://www.dee-web.com/
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>You don't have to swim faster than the shark...
>You just have to swim faster than the people you're with.
>
>Friday, October 06, 2000, 7:38:17 PM, you wrote:
>
>JW> Howdy,
>
>JW> I've noticed, when using top and ktop,that something called klogd (kernel
>logger?) is usually using 75 to 85 % of the CPU. This seems very strange, not only do
>I think it shouldn't be that way,
>JW> the box isn't a slow box - I mean, it's still very responsive and everything,
>hardly seems to be under 80% load.
>
>JW> First, I hope someone can confirm that klogd shouldn't be using 80% CPU.
>JW> Second, I wonder how I can figure out if it really is using that much or if top
>is lying.
>JW> Third, if top isn't lying, I wonder if there's something I can do to make klogd
>"calm down"? Any ideas what that would be?
>
>JW> Thanks,
>
>JW> JW
>
>
>
>JW> _______________________________________________
>JW> Redhat-list mailing list
>JW> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>JW> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Redhat-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
