On a Redhat 6.1 system, I find:
[test@it-router2 test]$ find /usr/include -type f -exec grep -n INT_MAX {}
/dev/null \;
/usr/include/limits.h:91:# define INT_MIN (-INT_MAX - 1)
/usr/include/limits.h:92:# define INT_MAX 2147483647
/usr/include/limits.h:96:# define UINT_MAX 4294967295U
/usr/include/limits.h:98:# define UINT_MAX 4294967295
[test@it-router2 test]$ rpm -qf /usr/include/limits.h
glibc-devel-2.1.2-11
Looks to me like it's not a Redhat problem, but yours -- you don't have
the right stuff installed.
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Vidiot wrote:
> I am having damn lousy luck getting gcc 2.95.2 to compile because
> Red Hat appears to not have installed stuff.
>
> Now the gcc compile stops at:
>
> gcc -c -DIN_GCC -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I./config -I./../include
>./genattrtab.c
> ./genattrtab.c: In function `max_attr_value':
> ./genattrtab.c:4733: `INT_MAX' undeclared (first use in this function)
> ./genattrtab.c:4733: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> ./genattrtab.c:4733: for each function it appears in.)
> make[1]: *** [genattrtab.o] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/gcc-2.95.2/gcc'
> make: *** [all-gcc] Error 2
>
>
> What really makes this so laughable is that gcc 2.95.2 compiles under RH 5.0.
I forget, was it 5.0 or 6.0 when Redhat started using glibc in place of
libc?
Jim Cunning
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
