>I was not saying how RedHat should/could/would be able to do it, no doubt
>they will be using load balancining and all sorts of software to achieve
>what they want, but if the person who asked wants to have domain.com and
>www.domain.com working on the same box, its easy to do, I do it on many of
>my own box's, thats all. Sorry if you thought I was saying that you were
>wrong, I did not look into it at all (and won't be).
>
>a CNAME record don't care where its pointed to is what I was telling Mikkel
>really.
>Greg Wright
>IT Consultant Sydney Australia
You changed the scope of the discussion. The original poster was complaining
that redhat.com didn't support their web pages and that www.redhat.com had
to be used. The discussion was supposed to be how it was not possible for
Red Hat to have redhat.com redirect to www.redhat.com without actually
starting a web server. You came in and said that it could be done with
DNS, which I (and another person) responded that it couldn't be done and
you came back and said that it could.
Now you are saying that you meant that it could be done for other boxes.
For that I will not disagree, since I am a prime example of that working,
i.e., www and ftp.vidiot.com all point to vidiot.com, which is in
reality mrvideo.vidiot.com.
When you stray from the topic, and don't say so, the others get lost.
I was wondering how an IT consultant could get this wrong. :-)
MB
--
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bart: Hey, why is it destroying other toys? Lisa: They must have
programmed it to eliminate the competition. Bart: You mean like
Microsoft? Lisa: Exactly. [The Simpsons - 12/18/99]
Visit - URL:http://www.vidiot.com/ (Your link to Star Trek and UPN)
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
