On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 09:08:02PM -0500, Vidiot wrote:
[...]
> Without the Reply-To, it is not "easy" to reply to one or the other. The
> easy is to hit r) and one gets the author. To get the group, I have to
> hit t)o before mailing and change the To: to the list. At least I have
> an RHL alias to speed that up. The main point is that I have to go out of
> the way to reply to the mail list, without also replying to the author.
> I do not consider that easy. Of course, if I do my usual, I edit and send.
> Oops, that means it went to the wrong place.
[...]
Just an aside: As you're already using a text based mail program, you
could for example consider using mutt instead of elm. mutt has in fact
three reply commands, giving me a very fine grained control over where
I'm replying to:
r - replies to author (N.B.: This functionality is destroyed by Reply-To
list!)
g - replies to group, i.e. all (list + author)
L - replies to list only
I made the transition from elm to mutt myself about three years ago
(albeit for other reasons than the above - that was an added bonus) and
never looked back.
Regards,
Thomas
--
"Look, Ma, no obsolete quotes and plain text only!"
Thomas Ribbrock | http://www.bigfoot.com/~kaytan | ICQ#: 15839919
"You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!"
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
