I happen to agree with Mike, for redhat-list, at least. Setting the
reply to the sender is what I do with some lists to try to reduce the
amount of traffic that list members must deal with. However, in this
particular forum, I sense that more conversation is desired, not less.
| NOOOOO, that is NOT the way it is supposed to work. A prime example is
| what happened with Kambiz's reply and my reply to you. What happened?
| You get TWO copies of the e-mail. The last thing I need is MORE e-mail
| in my mail box.
Actually, for the sissies like me who filter, the one addressed to the
list goes into the file for that list, and the one addressed to me
lands in my main inbox where I will notice it soonest. Sure, I see
the message twice, but things that need my attention don't have to
wait for me to wade through list mail, and I still get to see the
message in the context of discussion.
The macho guys who can keep thousands of messages all mentally
threaded have my abiding respect.
Romain Kang Disclaimer: I speak for myself alone,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] except when indicated otherwise.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
