use Jason's procmail recipe as a start, and put your *own* [RHL] on the subjects. jeesh. This is not a complicated topic. Why can't each person handle their own mail the way they please and not enforce it on the rest of us? On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Vidiot wrote: > >Can we lose the [RHL] prefix? It's silly, clutters up the list of > >messages, and generally makes it harder to read. > >Jason Costomiris <>< | Technologist, geek, human. > > NO DO NOT LOSE THE PREFIX!!!! > > I am a subscriber of many lists and the prefix helps me determine from > which mail list the message comes from. > > I am very happy to see that it was added to this list. _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- This silly [RHL] nonsense. Jason Costomiris
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Adam Goucher
- [RHL] Re: [RHL] Re: [RHL] Re: ;) This sill... Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: [RHL] Re: [RHL] Re: [RHL] Re: ;) T... Vidiot
- Re: [RHL] Re: [RHL] Re: [RHL] Re: ... Bob Taylor
- Re: [RHL] Re: [RHL] Re: [RHL] Re: ... Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Vidiot
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Charles Galpin
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Kambiz Aghaiepour
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Bret Hughes
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Nitebirdz
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Martin Brown
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. John Aldrich
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Danny
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Anthony E . Greene
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Steve Frampton
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Anthony E . Greene
- Re: This silly [RHL] nonsense. Peter Kiem