On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 09:04:43PM -0400, Charles Galpin wrote: > conf.modules: > > alias scsi_hostadapter aha1542 > alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc > alias eth0 ne > alias eth1 ne > options ne io=0x340,0x300 irq=9,5 > options aha1542 io=0x330 Have you tried?: options aha1542 ioport=0x330 I've never been able to figure out from the kernel source what exactly the argment names of parameters are, but 'ioport' looks much more likely than simply 'io'. The silly part is that if you look at the driver, 0x330 is the default I/O port. -- Steve Borho Voice: 314-615-6365 Member of Technical Staff Celox Networking Inc Fortune of the day: Predestination was doomed from the start. -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
- New nfs-utils claims I have wrong kernel vik
- Re: New nfs-utils claims I have wrong kernel Gordon Messmer
- Re: New nfs-utils claims I have wrong kern... Bret Hughes
- Re: New nfs-utils claims I have wrong ... Gordon Messmer
- RE: New nfs-utils claims I have wrong kernel Ward William E PHDN
- RE: New nfs-utils claims I have wrong kern... Gordon Messmer
- loading scsi module on boot Charles Galpin
- Re: loading scsi module on boot Steve Borho
- Re: loading scsi module on bo... Charles Galpin
- Re: loading scsi module o... Steve Borho
- Re: loading scsi modu... Charles Galpin
- Re: loading scsi modu... Stephen L Arnold
- Re: loading scsi modu... Charles Galpin
- Re: loading scsi modu... John Aldrich
- Re: loading scsi modu... Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: loading scsi modu... Charles Galpin
- Re: loading scsi modu... Steve Borho
- Re: loading scsi modu... Charles Galpin