actually it's more about you being root, unintentionaly running someone else's script. In my example I should have pointed out that *anyone* could create an executeable file called /tmp/ls. charles On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Jake McHenry wrote: > > ok, thanks for the info. I never really thought of it like that, someone else > running as root. Even though they would never get my password, I guess there are > other ways of becoming root. Thanks again. > > jake > > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Charles Galpin wrote: > > --I didn't see anyone answer this, so I'll give it a stab. > -- > --It protects you against trojans. The beauty of the unix security model is > --that a 'regular' user can't do much wrong to the system, only to > --themselves. However if you can get root to run something malicious (like > --"rm -rf /") then you can really cause some damage. -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
- Re: su and root not the same?? Dave Reed
- Re: su and root not the same?? Stephen L Arnold
- Re: su and root not the same?? David McLaughlin
- Re: su and root not the same?? Vidiot
- Re: su and root not the same?? Jake McHenry
- Re: su and root not the same?? Steve Feehan
- Re: su and root not the same?? Jake McHenry
- Re: su and root not the same?? Steve Arnold
- Re: su and root not the same?? Charles Galpin
- Re: su and root not the same?? Jake McHenry
- Re: su and root not the same?? Charles Galpin
- Re: su and root not the same?? Jake McHenry
- Re: su and root not the same?? John Aldrich
- Re: su and root not the same?? Jake McHenry
- Re: su and root not the same?? John Aldrich
- Re: su and root not the same?? Jake McHenry
- Re: su and root not the same?? John Aldrich
- Re: su and root not the same?? Stephen L Arnold
- Re: su and root not the same?? John Aldrich
- Re: su and root not the same?? Charles Galpin
- Re: su and root not the same?? John Aldrich