On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Brian Ashe wrote:
> Hi Charles,
>
> Thanks for the insight. I can see how that makes sense.
>
> So here's another one for you... (this is just curiosity)
>
> What if you set up the virtual hosts to use alternate port?
> ie. a.com 10.10.10.1:4400
> b.com 10.10.10.1:4500
> This should fix the problem you were describing, but does leave us with a
> new one, which is that now people behind firewalls may not be able to use
> the secure connection due to those ports being non-standard.
I *think* this might work, but don't have the time to try. Yes non
standard ports may pose problems to some.
>
> Now can the redirect directive be used to compensate for this?
> ie. redirect http://a.com:443 http://a.com:4400
> Or would this need to be mapped for each file instead?
>
> This may not be the exact syntax, but I hope you see what I am after here.
nope, this won't help. Aftet the redirect you are back to the above
problem again :)
>
>
> Have fun,
always,
charles
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
