"Jumping on the guy with both feet in public is hardly any better, is it?"
I'd go as far as to assert that it is in fact a little better. It's pretty
simple, the one who isn't supporting the use of terrorism is right. Not a
lot of confusing variables in that equation. If, in the future, this causes
the original poster to consider other possible outcomes of this event, than
I would say it was effective.
Try and stick to the subject. If someone you cared about was a security
guard in that office, you'd be all over the poster too.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ric Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, June 02, 2000 11:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT: FW: Blast Rocks Microsoft Office in S. Africa
>
>
> Bret Hughes wrote:
> >
> > Jeff Graves wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Somebody's finally doing something postive about
> > > Microsoft....................
> > >
> > >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
>
> > maybe a subscription to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> would be more inline with this type of thinking
>
> you really think he deserves this massive retaliation?
>
> > Sorry about the lack of a sense of humor but I do not feel
> postings like this are benificial in any way to
> > the linux community or for that matter to humanity s a whole.
>
> Jumping on the guy with both feet in public is hardly any
> better, is it?
> Occupying the moral highground, to gain a clear field of fire, is not
> very humanistic.
>
>
> --
> : Ric "Wayward" Moore : [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
> : "If you can afford it, you don't want it" :
> :--------------: New motto for Y2k : -----------:
> : owned and trained by Calamity & Satin :
> :-----------------------------------------------:
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
>
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
