On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 12:28:03PM -0500, Prentice wrote:
> Is anyone following this thread anymore? Getting rid of the colors in ls was
> easy - I just deleted /etc/profile.d/colorls.* If I wanted to it just for
> myself, I could have added unalias ls (or something like that) to my .bashrc
> file. 

    My point was that doing that isn't good practice, where systems
    administration goes.

    /etc/skel/.bashrc:

    # .bashrc

    # User specific aliases and functions

    # Source global definitions
    if [ -f /etc/bashrc ]; then
            . /etc/bashrc
    fi

    If you add "unalias ls" or "alias ls='ls --youroptions'" to $HOME/.bashrc
    after 'fi', you've continued to allow for shell profiles (which is really
    quite cool, when you get into it) and still gotten your way.

> The problem is with the *MAN* pages - they come up in color, and the dark
> blue and green are practically impossible to read. I imagine this is a matter
> of fixing some X11 settings somewhere, but the question is "where?"  In this
> case, it looks like my xterminal window is adding the color, since man
> pages on remote machines (other O/S's, too) are coming up in color, too. I
> think I could edit /etc/termcap to make all ther terminal types monchrome,
> but that would be a lot of work and would probably make *everything* black
> and white, including menu-based programs like ntsysv or disk druid. 
> 
> There's got be be an easy way to do this. Doesn't anyone at RH who know how
> they are doing this read this list?

    Do any other colors seem awkward?  And does the color appear while
    in console mode, or just X?  What kind of video card are you using?
    I only ask because I've seen this happen before with cruddy cards,
    and the default behavior doesn't include color for the manual pages.
-- 
    - Isaiah


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.

Reply via email to