> A document on the redhat.com site says raiding your swap partitions is a > bad idea, because you will take a big performance hit if memory needed for > the raid in case of failure resides in swap. The machine I am configuring Not to mention when you build multiple swap partitions and run swapon, linux automatically balances accross the swap partitions anyways. ----------------------------------------------------- Brian Feeny (BF304) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 318-222-2638 x 109 http://www.shreve.net/~signal Network Administrator ShreveNet Inc. (ASN 11881) -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
- Root RAID under 6.1 - a false sense of security? Eric Sisler
- Re: Root RAID under 6.1 - a false sense of securi... Aaron Turner
- Re: Root RAID under 6.1 - a false sense of se... Trevor Astrope
- Re: Root RAID under 6.1 - a false sense o... Brian
- Re: Root RAID under 6.1 - a false sense o... Jason Costomiris
- Re: Root RAID under 6.1 - a false sen... Samuel Flory
- Re: Root RAID under 6.1 - a fals... Trevor Astrope
- Re: Root RAID under 6.1 - a ... Jason Costomiris
- Re: Root RAID under 6.1 - a ... Samuel Flory
- Re: Root RAID under 6.1 - a false sense o... Eric Sisler
- Re: Root RAID under 6.1 - a false sense of securi... Mikkel L. Ellertson