Hi Manuel, > I am not refusing the idea about long signatures, as I consider them > interesting and totally understandable, but, if someone wants to sign half a > page long because it makes him happy, that is not hurting me -or anyone > else- in anyway Not necessarily. A friend of mine was once in a situation where she had to pay by the byte for her email. As you might guess she wasn't interested in any extraneous material, especially since she had a limited budget. The above probably more an exception than the norm, but taking it into account wouldn't be such a bad thing. ~Rob -- Rob Saul | JBuilder QA -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
- Re: FTP access Alan Mead
- RE: FTP access Darren Line
- RE: FTP access Duncan Hill
- Re: FTP access Ron Golan
- RE: FTP access rpjday
- Re: FTP access FLAME Eric Cifreo
- Re: FTP access FLAME rpjday
- RE: FTP access FLAME Manuel Antonio Camacho Quesada
- RE: FTP access FLAME Charles Galpin
- RE: FTP access FL... Manuel Antonio Camacho Quesada
- RE: FTP access FL... Rob Saul
- RE: FTP access FL... Manuel Antonio Camacho Quesada
- Re: FTP access FL... sgulick
- Re: FTP access FLAME Virtual Angel
- [OT] sigs (was: FTP a... Thomas Ribbrock \(Design/DEG\)
- [still OT] sigs (... Virtual Angel
- Re: FTP access Adam Sleight
- RE: FTP access Juha Saarinen
- annoying sigs (was RE: ftp... rpjday
- Re: FTP access Bret Hughes
- RE: FTP access Alan Mead