Title: RE: FTP access FLAME

Your apology is accepted.
The reason why we need that on is because my company works in the Financial business and sometimes confidential information about our clients financial status and holdings is sent via email - hence the need for that (unfortunately) long disclaimer.

-----Original Message-----
From: rpjday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 March 2000 13:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FTP access FLAME



On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Eric Cifreo wrote:

>
>
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Darren Line wrote:
> >
> > ... body of message snipped ...
> >
> > > **********************************************************************
> > > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and
> > >
> > <flame on>
> >
> > will you please, fer cryin' out loud, trim that insipid signature??
> > sheesh.
>
> You make a good point about pointless bullsh!t in .sigs.  Nobody wants to
> see your 50 lines of ASCII art that often.
>
> However, (and I'm leaping to just as large a conclusion as you have) did you
> even stop to consider that his smtp server at his company just might be
> automatically appending this to each outgoing message?  Who would want this
> crap on their messages anyway?

if this is the case, then of course i'm out of line and feeling a mite
sheepish.  but i'm getting powerful tired of pointless, off-topic
signatures.  and it's not just the length these days.

over the last few days, i've had sigs on technical newsgroups tell
me more than i want to know about their posters's political leanings,
their fondness for thomas jefferson quotes, their religious affiliation,
their love of the second amendment, and so on.  and i *know* those
aren't company policy sigs.

so it's not just the length that's getting irritating.  is there
some sort of grassroots movement i can start to get people to
smarten up with their sigs?  just curious.  sigh.

rday



--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.



**********************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and
may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the addressee
and others authorised to receive it. If you are not the intended
recipient or the person responsible for delivering this e-mail
to the intended recipient you are advised that you have
received this e-mail in error and any disclosure, copying, distribution
or action taken in reliance on the contents of this e-mail is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please advise the sender
immediately if you are not the intended recipient.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.pearson-jones.co.uk

**********************************************************************

Reply via email to