Form what I understand, it would be rather the other way around :
egcs is named gcc.
Try to do
> gcc -v
Philippe
"Michael J. McGillick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rick:
>
> Does this mean that gcc is now called egcs? I thought there was a
> discussion going on about gcc-2.95 was needed when rebuilding RPMs to take
> advantage of the i586 and i686 optimizations. Is this new egcs a
> combination of both of those, or is gcc-2.95 bring left out because it
> would cause other packages like kernel-headers to be changed to allow it
> to work?
>
> - Mike
>
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Rick Forrester wrote:
>
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > > Downloaded the beta ISO for 6.2, burned it and installed it on a
> > > machine I have hanging around here. I told it to install everything,
> > > and after it was all installed, I tried to determine what version of
> > > gcc got installed. To my suprise, none.
> >
> > > Is this not going to be part of the 6.2 release?
> >
> >
> > Something got tubed along the way. egcs/gcc is a part of the release,
> > should be egcs-1.1.2.
> >
> > best
> > rickf
> > --
> > Rick Forrister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > "To get something done a committee should consist of no more than
> > three people, two of whom are absent." Robert Copeland
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
> > as the Subject.
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
