yup, excpet we will all need to wait a while for a fast one. Looks really
interesting though.
I was a bit surprised though. I fully expected a 64 bit architecture, but
I guess their arch. allows them to know layer a 64 chipset on top of it.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, David wrote:
> Charles Galpin wrote:
> >
> > working great here (500mhz) on a stock 2.2.5-15 RH6.1 kernel.
> >
> > On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Michael George wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 20, Eric Wood wrote:
> > > > When Allen Bolderoff mentioned the "higher" in "RUN THEM ON A PENTIUM-PRO,
> > > > PII, PIII or Higher", he was subconsiously refering to the Athlon. :)
> > >
> > > Thank you for that information. I was wondering about that... BTW, is the
> > > Athalon a good processor, or does it have "issues"? I am going to be looking
> > > into a new computer, and the i686 RHL distro might be enough to cause me to
> > > get a more advanced processor...
>
> hmmm Athlon.............
>
> I want a Crusoe!!!!!!!!.... ;)
>
> David
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
