On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 11:34:51AM -0500, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> Just a general observation that probably applies to DSL
> implementations from all the baby bells and telcos...it is inherently
> more complicated setup when you start adding the necessary hardware
> layer at the telco CO. It is just one more thing that can go wrong,
> and the technology there is still very new. I find DSL not quite as
> reliable as dialup. While they advertised 'always on', doesn't mean
> 'always up'. BS does give a free dialup account so when DSL is down,
> you are not out in woods.
>

Hugh?  DSL should be inherently much more reliable than modem dial-up.
I've never heard of consistend outages that couldn't be traced to
the line or other faulty equipment.  Once replaced, it should work
rock solid.  I'd be contacting someone and complaining. 

-- 
J. Scott Kasten

jsk AT tetracon-eng DOT net

"That wasn't an attack.  It was preemptive retaliation!"


-- 
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.

Reply via email to