I have seen multiple emails from people claiming the same thing, and there
is a good deal of people having BIND problems in general, maybe it is a
combination of some other package & that ver of BIND that does this CPU
thing, but I am only speculating.......
>From what I know, anything in rawhide or outside official releases, your on
your own with.....correct me if its wrong.
The most commont complaint is when under heavy use with a lot of domains
its painful to start/stop , look at bugzilla....
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 4/01/00 at 23:30 Hossein S. Zadeh wrote:
>Following the thread on this list, I upgraded bind to patch level 5 on
>several Unix machines (some from source RPM (rawhide), some from pure
>source (from bind's home page)).
>
>Since then named consumes 60-100% of CPU. Right after startup it uses 100%
>CPU and it is extremely slow to respond (so much so that sometimes
>nslookup times out). After a few minutes the utilisation drops a little
>bit (60-80%), and it starts answering quesries in a timely manner.
>
>Has anyone else seen this? Is it a problem with patch level 5? Or we
>happen to be targetted for some strange DoS (or flood or whatever) attack?
>
>
>Hossein
Regards
Greg Wright
IT Consultant Sydney Australia
--
*** Please trim any replies ***
*** Please turn off HTML in your email ***
*** Please don't use the list for test messages ***
*** Why not read the archives? http://moongroup.com/redhat.phtml ***
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
