On Mon, 3 Jan 2000, Steve Borho said:
SB>On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 01:33:06PM -0500, Chuck Mead wrote:
SB>> Included above are my versions for comparisons sake... have you reported this
SB>> problem to the rpm list? Note that I do see some differences here... you can
SB>> get an updated version of rpm from:
SB>
SB>I reported it to Red Hat's Bugzilla, but not to the rpm list.
Bugzilla is good but I'd think the folks on the rpm list would love to hear
about this! I know that JJ was pounding the keys cleaning up rpm internals
pretty hard before Christmas... if there is a bug I know he'd love to hear
about it directly.
SB>>
SB>> ftp://ftp.rpm.org/pub/rpm/dist/rpm-3.0.x/rpm-3.0.3-6x.alpha.rpm
SB>>
SB>> ftp://ftp.rpm.org/pub/rpm/dist/rpm-3.0.x/rpm-devel-3.0.3-6x.alpha.rpm
SB>
SB>Excuse me while I whip out wget.
He-he!
--
Chuck Mead, CTO, MoonGroup Consulting, Inc. <http://moongroup.com>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available at: wwwkeys.us.pgp.net
1:36pm up 2 days, 9:06, 1 user, load average: 0.32, 0.24, 0.21
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
