----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Fausey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] graphs
> But this report says NT is better and more scaleable than Linux. This
> can't be correct.
> >> I am doing a report for class comparing Linux to other OSes (NT) and
> >> need some graphs and/or charts, it is a course requirement. Does
anyone
> >> know of a URL that has a graph comparing Linux's uptime or performance
> >> to other OSes?
NT is better for sustained high-bandwidth data transfer - i.e. for porn
sites, AFAIR from the Slashdot rebuttal. Also, _stability_ and _cost_ not
really taken into account. Scaleability? I recall reading that NT is more
scaleable. It's entirely possible that NT is superior to Linux in some ways
which show up under a benchmark comparison. The trouble is, most of the
recent studies (Mindcraft and the Gartner Group, I'm looking at you) have
been biased.
Check out the Slashdot archives for the articles on Hallowe'en, Linux Myths,
Gartner Group, Mindcraft etc.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
