Funny thing being, an OS with good multitasking is a natural for something
like a winmodem, doing it under win3.1 was madness.  I mean, you have this
fast cpu essentially doing nothing (my p133 is rarely near 50% load, even
under NT), why not make a dumb modem (but with a big buffer, unlike our 16
byte 16550A fifo's), and put the smarts for the cpu to deal with?

And for that matter, not just X-10, we have networked coke machines after
all (SAP Labs has one with a Strong ARM chip, that generates a transaction
with R3 on every purchase for showing off at trade shows).  I mean, why not
have access to a graph of temperature and door openings?  Use the MTRG to
show you a history of your use.


At 06:22 AM 5/7/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Larry Lade wrote:
>> 
>> Eric Goforth wrote:
>> >
>> > After browsing though over 200 matches for the string "linux winmodem"
I'm
>> > sure what the answer to my question will be, but I'll ask it just in
case.
>> > There isn't any chance of my being able to get my Compaq 56K-VSC Winmodem
>> > that came with my Presario to work under Linux, is there?
>> 
>> No. You have a better chance of getting your refrigerator to work under
>> Linux.
>> 
>
>Actually with an X10 chip from Radio Shack I can make your refrigerator
>work with Linux.
>
>Paul Anderson
>
>
>-- 
>  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
>http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
>         To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
>                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
>
>


-- 
  PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
         To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
                       "unsubscribe" as the Subject.

Reply via email to