> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Otto Haliburton > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 4:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: C++ lib compatibility between Red Hat 9 and 7.3 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Behalf Of Hal Burgiss > > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 3:12 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: C++ lib compatibility between Red Hat 9 and 7.3 > > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 06:32:58PM -0500, Otto Haliburton wrote: > > > Ideas grow from debate and criticism. New things are tried because > > somebody > > > disagreed or decided on a better way to do it. As I will say again. > > You > > > are prone to talk out of the wrong end. > > > > Maybe so, but I've never had the problems you had here (using RH since > > ~'97). I guess my "wrong end" has more brain power than your "right > > end". > > > > I doubt many of the RH users on this list care, much less have the > > ability to fix or even make a decision that will lead to some > > improvement. If you seriously think you have grand, novell ideas, and > > want to see improvements, pitch it on the gcc developers list. > > > > -- > > Hal Burgiss > > > > > There you go again talking of the wrong end. > let me give you an example and if you have the resources try it. Get a audigy soundcard and build it with gcc 2.96 now see if it works. Take that same source and build it with a latter compiler and see if it builds. Take both sources to any linux machine and see if it works. Even better build some of the kernels with the old compiler and see if they work, take those same kernels and build with the latest compiler and see if they still work. My point is you don't know what you're going to get and if it's going to work with the compiler you select and throw in hardware and you have a even bigger problem.
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
