-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:34:04 -0400 (EDT), Rik Thomas wrote:
> No where did I say digital signatures weren't important. They are a
> vital tool in personal communication, not on a group mailing lists. I
> said they were not appreciated on mailing lists. In fact, I believe
> rfc1855 mentions something about it. One of those "netiquette" rfcs.
>
> I am backing off as this is completely off topic.
- From rfc1855:
- Forging of news articles is generally censured. You can protect
yourself from forgeries by using software which generates a
manipulation detection "fingerprint", such as PGP (in the US).
No other mention of PGP or fingerprints. Searching for "sig"
only turns up the usual guidelines wrt to footers.
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/ixz90iMVcrivHFQRAnV1AJ9R3NQpIw540kZZytGrQRDVOVJVcwCcCwue
pYu6BI+y8bmr207b8OKtxGM=
=0WEV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
