Hal Burgiss wrote:
> IANAE, but I was on the procmail mailing list long enough to see this
> same scenario come up several times, and the consensus among the
> experts was that this approach is fundamentally flawed. IOW, quick use
> of sed to de-htmlize has many pitfalls, and ways to fall over, and no

It appears as though procmail offers no "undo" feature of a filter.  Filters
are permanent within the pipe stream - much like a command line.  There's
got to be a way to save the message to disk and retrieve the original
message farther down in the recipe in case your filter needs to be undone.

-eric wood


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to