> On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote: > > > I just installed the SpamAssassin 2.55 rpms. That part of the install > > went smoothly. At least spamd came up just fine. > > If you end up using MailScanner to call SpamAssassin then you don't need > spamd.
I understand, but the install started it automatically. And I have it running right now until I can get MailScanner working properly. > > I then told Mailscanner to use the SpamAssassin in > > /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf, but then whenever I start MS, I get the > > following error in my /var/log/maillog: > > > > Sep 22 19:08:03 mail MailScanner[2682]: SpamAssassin installation could > > not be found > > Hmmm, I wonder where the rpm put the spamassassin executable. Mine is in > /usr/bin/spamassassin. See if it's there and it's in your path. Well, I see a /usr/bin/spamassassin binary. I'm not sure who the MailScanner is running as, so I don't know about the path, but I did try setting the binary path in the MailScanner.conf file: SpamAssassin Install Prefix = /usr/bin And no dice. I'm still getting the same error. I've even tried: SpamAssassin Install Prefix = /usr/bin/spamassassin Same deal. So then I tried doing a google on "SpamAssassn Install Prefix", and found nothing. > > Unless you can shed some light, I'll be going back to the old way of using > > procmail to initiate spamassassin, rather than trying to use MailScanner > > to do it. > > That works but it's slower. Why? If spamd is already loaded, wouldn't it be faster for MailScanner to use spamc instead? I thought it would cut on loading time... Ben -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
