[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. RE: Outlook Question (I know, but please bear with me...) (Richard Crawford) 2. Re: Port Forward 1 Port (James Pifer) 3. Re: LPIC passing percentage? (Kevin MacNeil) 4. firewall conf (Ivo Tijhaar) 5. NIC comes up with reboot, but something wrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 6. Re: PostgreSQL or MySQL on RedHat (Reuben D. Budiardja) 7. Re: dhcpd catch-22 (Parker Morse) 8. Re: redhat-list digest, Vol 1 #8282 - 37 msgs (Thomas Fortner)
--__--__--
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:16:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: RE: Outlook Question (I know, but please bear with me...) From: "Richard Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Haney said:
Hmm, to be honest, I've had nothing but pain and anguish from Outlook 2k
on WinXP. I've had to upgrade every XP box we have here to Office XP
just to get Outlook to even work. Is this a reasonable step for you to
take?
Unfortunately, no. Office 2000 was a legitimate purchase a few years ago when my wife and I were both Windows junkies (fortunately, I, at least, have been cured of that misguided thinking). Office XP is too expensive for us, and has far too many features that I just plain don't want.
Sliante, Richard S. Crawford
http://www.mossroot.com AIM: Buffalo2K ICQ: 11646404 Y!: rscrawford MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Howard Dean for America: http://www.deanforamerica.com "It is only with the heart that we see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye." --Antoine de Saint Exupéry
--__--__--
Message: 2 Subject: Re: Port Forward 1 Port From: James Pifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: RedHat List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 03 Sep 2003 12:03:50 -0400 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In this case another device isn't really an option.
I tried this: # iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp -d 10.96.5.5 --dport 162 -j DNAT --to 192.168.1.18:162 # iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -d 192.168.1.18 --dport 162 -j ACCEPT
# iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT udp -- anywhere 192.168.1.18 udp dpt:snmptrap
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination #
It's not forwarding anything though. Before anyone asks, the networks
10.96.5.x and 192.168.1.x are reachable. I have Ethreal running
capturing 162 on both systems. 10.96.5.5 is receiving tons of 162's,
192.168.1.18 is not receiving any. Tells me the forward isn't working.
Any suggestions?
Thanks, James
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 11:36, Joe Polk wrote:
Probably so. Or buy a cheap NAT Router and do it...but then you have NAT interference being in a simple LAN and may have to define static routes, but the interface is simple enough (Web).
<<JAV>>
---------- Original Message ----------- From: James Pifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: RedHat List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 03 Sep 2003 10:28:01 -0400 Subject: Re: Port Forward 1 Port
Very cool program, but I need to forward UDP port 162 (SNMP traps)--
redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
