LOL did you read the complete thread. As usual you leap in misinformed I hope I make whatever filters you have so that I don't hear from you again. Redhat installs via rpm for up2date but doesn't delete anything from your disk. It doesn't in anyway suggest using rpm to remove previous version for the risk of removing utils/libs and other things. So as I have learned before. You continue to be misinformed both on grub and this issue. I hope I definitely make your procmail.
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:redhat-list- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Schwendt > Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 5:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: /Boot is full - advice please > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 14:56:11 -0500, Otto Haliburton wrote: > > > Does anybody on this list read How to install a linux kernel? I > don't > > think so because if you did, it explicitly tells how to remove a > kernel > > manually. It doesn't even suggest to remove with rpm, because using > rpm > > removes the source and some people want the source especially if > they > > want to go back to a earlier version. > > With this message -- and I'm sorry to say that -- you have entered the > next level in my procmailrc: /dev/null instead of ./trash folder. > Congratulations! Few people so far have managed to achieve that. > Usually I give trolls a 2nd chance. > > As earlier with the sort of neverending GRUB thread, you are just > plain misinformed about proper usage of RPM with regard to kernel > packages. Kernel source and binary kernel are in two completely > separate packages. Never would erasing a kernel package remove the > source package. > > > The person who started the thread > > did expressly say that he used RHN and /boot was full. It should > never > > be recommended that he uses rpm > > Wrong. RHN => up2date installs packages via RPM. So, using RPM to > erase > the installed RPM packages is fully correct. > > > unless the full consequences are known > > and that is what I told him. > > You didn't even try to tell him. Instead you demonstrate misconception > about using kernel packages. Using RPM has the only risk that you can > remove the currently running kernel which would not be appreciated if > you wanted a guaranteed clean shutdown. > > > I didn't say don't use it. Before you > > guys started recommending using rpm to remove a kernel remember that > > redhat doesn't do that itself and it could. > > *lol* They do. See my earlier message. Certainly, they [Red Hat] do > not > recommend leaving old kernel packages in the RPM database and delete > files manually. > > - -- > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE/RpZc0iMVcrivHFQRAnLmAJ9XNmv8kcFXb0y/egtysZjLgnx/bACeNUzl > Ke2PZHxK8Y+3r1N/3blDNfg= > =I0X9 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
