How about Linux to cisco?
Benny
Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 13:10, Bret Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 09:59, Jason Dixon wrote:
> >
> > As far as Windows clients go, I prefer SSH Sentinel. Very easy to
> > setup, nice to administer and track network usage. Unfortunately,
> > they've recently stopped selling it retail and now only offer it through
> > resellers/rebranding. Softnet's Soft-PK is supposed to work nicely on
> > Windows and comply with the open source IPsec implementations, but I
> > haven't tried it yet.
> >
>
> Hmm. I am about to wade into the windows -> linux vpn connectivity at
> our office. We have used simple ssh tunneled ppp conncetions for years
> betwen two linux boxes. It was my understanding that there is "builtin"
> ipsec capability in XP that works with FreeSwan Is this ! not the case?
Yes, Windows XP includes IPsec support via the MMC/Security plugins.
Unfortunately, it's a hideous mess to setup/maintain, IMHO. Folks with
more experience running Windows XP's native IPsec support may argue
otherwise, but that's why they're experts. ;-) For my money
($99-$129), most 3rd party IPsec Windows clients are worth it.
--
Jason Dixon, RHCE
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Do you Yahoo!?
Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
