On 08 Aug 2003 19:42:29 -0400 Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 19:26, Sean Estabrooks wrote: > > > > > > > > You can't. > > > > > > Not true. > > > > > > > Send me a public URL with a "protected" site and i'll send > > you a zip with 100 of their protected pictures... > > Gosh, you're my hero. What a l33t h4x0r. > > Obviously, none of these are absolute. Nothing in life is. But it > *will* stop the average crosslinking moron. Better to try and succeed > sometimes than to never try at all. >
Hmmm... i thought we were having a discussion about what was possible. You didn't seem to acknowledge the possibility in your post so i simply demonstrated a common sense approach. Of course you may elect to implement something that is good enough for your needs. However, i was trying to make the point strongly that the poster should not believe anything he posts on the web can be protected with some silly scheme. Cheers, Sean -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
