> -----Original Message----- > From: Shaun T. Erickson > Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 4:32 PM > Subject: Re: DNS Report/Sendmail > > > Cowles, Steve wrote: > > > > I get the same warning at this end. Technically, dnsreports > > is correct (RFC reference), but personally, I do not plan on > > fixing this type of warning. > > And that may get you correctly blacklisted at rfc-ignorant.org.
You know! - I typically do not reply to one-liner replies such as yours (especially when I did not start the thread). At my age, I tend to "pick and choose my battles wisely in life", but your reply just rubbed me the wrong way. Why? Because I don't think you have read the "Listing Policy" section of rfc-ignorant.org. No where does it state in the "criteria" section that NOT accepting [EMAIL PROTECTED] can get you nominated to be listed. Yes, the referenced RFC states that, but not the criteria used by rfc-ignorant.org. It specifically states acceptance of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Which BTW, is why dnsreports states that the test mentioned in this thread ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is a warning, not a failure that needs to be resolved. Please feel free to correct my if I'm wrong. Steve Cowles -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
