On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 12:31, Chris W. Parker wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to sell my boss on replacing our Win2k IIS web server with a RH8/9 Apache
> server. Although it's my understanding that Linux is more secure than windows I
> really don't have much to point out in defense on that idea.
>
> Please list for me reasons why you believe (or know for a fact) that Linux is more
> secure than our current setup. Let's assume two different situations: 1. Out of the
> box with a standard install, 2. Standard install, fully patched.
Some of this comes down to a contrast of Apache to IIS. Also when we
reviewed this issue, we determined that Postfix was an ideal solution
that offers excellent security and spam rejection flexibility.
I'm far from a technically competent person and we are too small a firm
to have a dedicated IT person so I'm it.
--
* Total Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
