On Tuesday 24 June 2003 12:19 pm, Mike Wafkowski wrote: > You're kind of missing the point. It seems like most Linux boosters do and > I believe on purpose so as not to "undermine" Linux. No X no KDE, no > Gnome. <snip> > So I'll rephrase my complaint. X plus (the full blown wm of your choice > here) sucks, <snip>
And you might miss some points too. As others, I don't see how come X sucks. What is the basis of this premise? You might say KDE, or GNOME or whatever sucks because it's bloated and slow. But the X itself, I can't see why it sucks also just because KDE or GNOME or whatever runs on X. And I'll say it again, X + another lightweight WM is fast. This alone is proof that X is fine. Because if X also sucks, then you can put anything on it, it will still sucks. RDB -- Reuben D. Budiardja Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN ------------------------------------------------- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign against HTML \ / email and proprietary format X attachments. / \ ------------------------------------------------- Have you been used by Microsoft today? Choose your life. Choose freedom. Choose LINUX. ------------------------------------------------- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
