Michael Fratoni wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On Thursday 29 May 2003 10:20 pm, Charles R. Dennett wrote:
> 
>>Hal Burgiss wrote:
>>
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] redhat-list-annoyances]$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/sensors
>>>lm_sensors-2.6.3-2
>>>
>>>Its part of RH AFAIK.
>>
>>Thanks.  Cot some work to do:
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] bus]# sensors
>>Can't access /proc file
>>/proc/sys/dev/sensors/chips or /proc/bus/i2c unreadable;
>>Make sure you have done 'modprobe i2c-proc'!
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] bus]# modprobe i2c-proc
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] bus]# sensors
>>No sensors found!
>>
>>Looks like I have to figure out /etc/sensors.conf.
> 
> 
> Running 'sensors-detect' will help with the rest.
> 
> - -- 
> - -Michael

Thanks.  Tried that.  Here are some snippets of the output:

==========================================================================
Could not find dmidecode, which should have been installed with lm_sensors.
 Runing dmidecode would help us determining your system vendor, which allows
 safer operations. Please provide one of the following:
  /usr/local/sbin/dmidecode
  /usr/sbin/dmidecode


We can start with probing for (PCI) I2C or SMBus adapters.
 You do not need any special privileges for this.
 Do you want to probe now? (YES/no):
Probing for PCI bus adapters...
Sorry, no PCI bus adapters found.

We will now try to load each adapter module in turn.
 Do you now want to be prompted for non-detectable adapters? (yes/NO):
 To continue, we need module `i2c-dev' to be loaded.
 If it is built-in into your kernel, you can safely skip this.
 i2c-dev is not loaded. Do you want to load it now? (YES/no):
 Module loaded succesfully.


Do you want to scan the ISA bus? (YES/no):
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78'
  Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78-J'
  Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `National Semiconductor LM79'
  Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `Winbond W83781D'
  Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `Winbond W83782D'
  Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `Winbond W83627HF'
  Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `Winbond W83697HF'
  Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595'
  Trying general detect... Failed!
Probing for `VIA Technologies VT82C686 Integrated Sensors'
  Trying general detect... Failed!
Probing for `VIA Technologies VT8231 Integrated Sensors'
  Trying general detect... Failed!
Probing for `ITE IT8705F / IT8712F / SiS 950'
  Trying address 0x0290... Failed!
Probing for `IPMI BMC KCS'
  Trying address 0x0ca0... Failed!
Probing for `IPMI BMC SMIC'
  Trying address 0x0ca8... Failed!


If you have the choice, do you want to use the ISA bus or the
 I2C/SMBus (ISA/smbus)?

WARNING! If you have some things built into your kernel, the
below list will contain too many modules. Skip the appropriate ones!
To load everything that is needed, add this to some /etc/rc* file:

#----cut here----
# I2C adapter drivers
# I2C chip drivers
#----cut here----

To make the sensors modules behave correctly, add these lines to either
/etc/modules.conf or /etc/conf.modules:

#----cut here----
# I2C module options
alias char-major-89 i2c-dev
#----cut here----

Do you want to generate /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors? (YES/no):
Copy prog/init/lm_sensors.init to /etc/rc.d/init.d/lm_sensors
for initialization at boot time.

============================================================================

I added the line to /etc/modules.conf and rebooted.  Still nothing.

I'll play around with this some more later.  I wouldn't be surprised if
the lm_sensors module that came with RH 9 is too old for my Asus A7V8X
motherboard.  Maybe it has some sensors that the program does not know
about.  An "rpm -qa | grep sensors" tells me it has lm_sensors-2.6.5-5.
I quick look through google indicates 2.7.0 may be the latest.

Meanwhile, if anyone has any ideas, I'd appreciate hearing them

Charlie


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to