Thank you for the explanation.  So long as I'm protected, I'm happy.

Irwin


On Tuesday 25 March 2003 02:54 pm, you wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 13:34:29 -0800, irwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 25 March 2003 12:23 pm, you wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 11:31:50AM -0800, irwin wrote:
> > > > I'm running RH7.2 and the installed Samba is samba-2.2.7-2.7.2.
> > > > The errata notice calls for upgrading to samba-2.2.8
>
> It doesn't say that. Read it again.
>
> > > Errata notice from whom?  Please don't forget that Red Hat frequently
> > > backports fixes from a new release into a previous release.
> >
> > I received the errata notice directly from RH. Piece of notice follows.
> >
> > -------------------------start
> > Security Advisory - RHSA-2003:095-19
>
> That is this one:
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-095.html
>
> You're up-to-date with samba-2.2.7-2.7.2. The new advisory
> just added:
>
>     [Updated 24 March 2003]
>     Updated samba packages for Red Hat Linux 6.2, 7, and 7.1 are now
>     included. These packages contain Samba version 2.0.10 with a
>     backported security fix.



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to