One last question.  Since I'm doing all partitions onto RAID devices across my 2 
drives, what's the proper way to do the swap partition?  I had set it up on both 
drives just to be consistent without knowing any good/bad implications of that.  I 
didn't want one drive to have a chunk of unused space equivalent to the swap partition 
size on the other drive.  With a swap partition on two drives, would Linux use 
either/both and therefore be somewhat resilient in case of a drive failure?

Just curious.  Thanks!

Stuart


-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Polk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 10:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 38 GB partitioning advice


I've not played with LVM myself, but it would certainly give you
flexibility. If I don't find a buyer for my HP Netserver, I may just
play with LVM myself.  For a relatively static server, though, I think
you'l do fine with the partitioning scheme I gave. I build most of my
servers based on such a percentage or setup. Now desktops and laptops
are a different beast. /usr really get's used then because you tend to
want to load a lot of applications on them. My first Linux book was one
that shipped with RH5.1. It did a good job of laying out what partitions
are used for and recommended sizes. I've loosely used that ever since,
upping the sizes for modern boxes and versions as I've moved along. 
Good luck on the project! Glad I could help.

<<JAV>>



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to